<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (P)retty (V)irulent (C)apsules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lesgaragistes.com/LesBlog/2007/07/07/pretty-virulent-capsules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lesgaragistes.com/LesBlog/2007/07/07/pretty-virulent-capsules/</link>
	<description>Les Garagistes is a shadowy cabal of friends who make wine together in an undisclosed location in SE Portland. Their blog is a concise catalog of blinding truths and outright fictions (not necessarily in that order), but it's worth a read anyway. Their wine is not for sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:20:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMCQ</title>
		<link>http://www.lesgaragistes.com/LesBlog/2007/07/07/pretty-virulent-capsules/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>JMCQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesgaragistes.com/LesBlog/2007/07/07/pretty-virulent-capsules/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Let it not be said that Les Garagistes n&#039;aiment pas la terre. Also, the parents among us can say &#039;Think of the children&#039; unironically. 

For the reasons you&#039;ve noted, I like the current solution. The resonance with Chianti bottles, the enhanced design presence, the readily referenced vintage date -- all good. I wonder if the time hasn&#039;t come for us to open the closure issue up for discussion at the most basic level. We&#039;ve now seen the sexy, sexy glass closures, and the less sexy but perfectly serviceable screwtops have, I think, broken the acceptance barrier among the wine-drinking masses. (Not that public opinion matters; we are practical people seeking practical solutions.) Obvious downsides: we wouldn&#039;t be able to reuse the bottles we&#039;ve amassed -- definitely an issue for George and me -- and we&#039;d retire the beloved little corker. But let us discuss.

In the near term, perhaps we could print on adhesive paper of the sort used for stamps -- either the old kind, which would mean swiping the strips on a sponge before applying, or the newer peel-offs.

I&#039;m all for taking plastics out of the process, and for Matt taking so much of his copious free time to research and write a long post. I am viscerally against Steven Milloy. And I wish that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/humor/letters/smithsonian.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this bit of lore&lt;/a&gt; about vintage Barbie dolls were genuine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let it not be said that Les Garagistes n&#8217;aiment pas la terre. Also, the parents among us can say &#8216;Think of the children&#8217; unironically. </p>
<p>For the reasons you&#8217;ve noted, I like the current solution. The resonance with Chianti bottles, the enhanced design presence, the readily referenced vintage date &#8212; all good. I wonder if the time hasn&#8217;t come for us to open the closure issue up for discussion at the most basic level. We&#8217;ve now seen the sexy, sexy glass closures, and the less sexy but perfectly serviceable screwtops have, I think, broken the acceptance barrier among the wine-drinking masses. (Not that public opinion matters; we are practical people seeking practical solutions.) Obvious downsides: we wouldn&#8217;t be able to reuse the bottles we&#8217;ve amassed &#8212; definitely an issue for George and me &#8212; and we&#8217;d retire the beloved little corker. But let us discuss.</p>
<p>In the near term, perhaps we could print on adhesive paper of the sort used for stamps &#8212; either the old kind, which would mean swiping the strips on a sponge before applying, or the newer peel-offs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for taking plastics out of the process, and for Matt taking so much of his copious free time to research and write a long post. I am viscerally against Steven Milloy. And I wish that <a href="http://www.snopes.com/humor/letters/smithsonian.asp" rel="nofollow">this bit of lore</a> about vintage Barbie dolls were genuine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.lesgaragistes.com @ 2012-02-10 06:25:14 by W3 Total Cache -->
